The only significance of such allegations is to impose or assign joint liability...to an actor who did not participate in the act itself, but had knowledge of it.
While we continue to believe that the plaintiffs' allegations are spurious, we determined that after seven years it was best for KKR and our limited partners to put an end to the distraction and expense of this litigation.
We have a situation where we are talking about allegations of sexual assault by a trustee against a university employee. How could that not be an issue for the university?
