United States: Fiduciary Duties Of Dissenting Directors And Their Boards – Stobart v Tinkler
In particular, the court disapproved of the director going "straight to shareholders" with what he said were corporate governance concerns, rather than ...
Related Articles
- EYVoice: Why Many Directors Prefer Private Company Boards also categorized in BoardBlogs
- United States: Exectuive Risks: A Boardroom Guide 2012/2013 also published in mondaq.com
- Why Jos. A. Bank Fights For Men's Wearhouse also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Proxy Advisory Services: Making Glass (Lewis) Transparent -- And ISS Too also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Social Media And The Boardroom - Media, Telecoms, IT and Entertainment also published in mondaq.com
- Churn and Burn: Why Customer Success Needs to be a Board Priority also categorized in BoardBlogs
- 'The Real Opportunity On Diversity Is To Be More Thoughtful' also categorized in BoardBlogs
- To Tender Or Not To Tender also published in mondaq.com
- 'If I Had More Time I Would Have Written A Shorter Letter' - Integrated Reporting also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Third Point Capital's Dan Loeb Talks About Sony; Olympus Rising also categorized in BoardBlogs
Login to comment.