Fiduciary Duties of Dissenting Directors and their Boards – Stobart v Tinkler - National Law Review -BoardProspects

Fiduciary Duties of Dissenting Directors and their Boards – Stobart v Tinkler

National Law Review Apr 17 2019 BoardBlogs

In Stobart v Tinkler [2019] EWHC 258 (Comm), the high court has taken an extremely restricted view of the freedom of a dissident director to take his case outside the boardroom. At the same time, the court largely endorsed the freedom of the board to silence that director with respect to public statements...
Read Full Article

Bookmark or Share this article

Login to comment.
Related Articles
- EYVoice: Why Many Directors Prefer Private Company Boards also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Third Point Capital's Dan Loeb Talks About Sony; Olympus Rising also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Third Circuit Discusses Important Differences Between Board Observers and Directors also published in National Law Review
- Shareholder Voting in California: I Don't Want To Express A Preference, But I also published in National Law Review
- Churn and Burn: Why Customer Success Needs to be a Board Priority also categorized in BoardBlogs
- 'The Real Opportunity On Diversity Is To Be More Thoughtful' also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Corporate governance problems facing the energy sector also mentions Fiduciary Duties
- The Power Of Investors When It Comes To Honing Corporate Governance also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Proxy Advisory Services: Making Glass (Lewis) Transparent -- And ISS Too also categorized in BoardBlogs
- EYVoice: Why You Should Act Like An IPO While You're Still Private also categorized in BoardBlogs

Search:
Categories
1. BoardProspects Features:
  BoardBlogs, BoardKnowledge, BoardMoves, BoardNews, BoardProspects Announcements, BoardProspects CEO, CEO Blog, In the News, Partner Publications, Sponsored Content
Topics Mentioned